Posted by: syanjali August 12, 2010
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
We are commenting here as we heard the story in past and present and depending upon our mental status as well how we process our thoughts.
We do not know the exact story and their family dynamic and the real inside story but we heard the superficial story as it broke it and we became the juror in favor to convict and against not seeing enough evidence to convict.
The verdict was solely based on the tape conversation between the girl and Ajaya( she may be abused by him or may be because of her behavior she was taken to Nepal and in anger she was trying to take the revenge or it might be mix of both, we do not know the truth ).
Lets be indifferent, as per NAS's comments on other thread, she had been not telling the truth and certain evidence was lied and does not favor her? If that is the case she may had fabricated?
The wrong doer must be punished but the question is who is right/innocent and who is in guilt/wrong, we do not know.
And Please, do not comment absurd like she is not her own daughter and had consensual sex, even she lied her aged during the adoption but still she is her adopted-daughter, the relation must be maintained and must follow the law and rules otherwise punishable. Guilt person must be punished.