Posted by: grgDai August 12, 2010
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Ok if you believe that saying "adopting 15 yr old is different than adopting an infant" has sick connotations then I will let your sick mind come up with any kind of your own personal conclusions. After all a man only sees what his inner mind wants to see and is familiar with.
I'm not even sure what you are arguing with me about here! Let's move on and focus on the main issue here. This posting is about a Nepali man who may be serving more time than he deserves.
Even a murderer doesn't get 300 years in prison and many things in this case points to the possibility that the girl involved may be concocting stories and is not reliable. Also, the behavior of the district attorney and the judge seems to be intent on indicting this man instead of giving a fair trial.
That is why we need to discuss what can be done so that there is a possibility of a re-trial.
Newlynew please leave your personal grandeur aside because we all know you are the smartest person and you know everything you are talking about and you don't need to insult others to prove your point. Let's focus on the main issue without trying to prove you are right and others are wrong. I think it's clear that you wanted to hang him initially or give him 10,000 years in prison and now after reviewing the case more, you sort of agree that a retrial is not a bad idea.
Correct me if I'm wrong here.
I'm not even sure what you are arguing with me about here! Let's move on and focus on the main issue here. This posting is about a Nepali man who may be serving more time than he deserves.
Even a murderer doesn't get 300 years in prison and many things in this case points to the possibility that the girl involved may be concocting stories and is not reliable. Also, the behavior of the district attorney and the judge seems to be intent on indicting this man instead of giving a fair trial.
That is why we need to discuss what can be done so that there is a possibility of a re-trial.
Newlynew please leave your personal grandeur aside because we all know you are the smartest person and you know everything you are talking about and you don't need to insult others to prove your point. Let's focus on the main issue without trying to prove you are right and others are wrong. I think it's clear that you wanted to hang him initially or give him 10,000 years in prison and now after reviewing the case more, you sort of agree that a retrial is not a bad idea.
Correct me if I'm wrong here.