Now that you guys are getting me started…

Pire, the examples you gave: Woody Harrelson and Clinton might have been relevant to the case we are discussing, however they were horrible examples of proving how American justice system is biased. Both Clinton and Harrelson did NOT break any law by having the consensual sex with the women, both of which were adult. Sure Clinton lied under oath and that was a violation while Harrelson’s doing was ethically wrong; but again there wasn’t a criminal misconduct like the case we are discussing here. Yes, O.J. Simpson’s case would be comparable of how somebody can buy justice around here, but that’s everywhere ain’t it?

grgBhai, You say what do I have to lose? Have you ever thought about it from the girl’s side. Let’s say she was really the victim. Read Nas’ post and his quoting of RmNY’s view point; would you still want to give him the benefit of doubt?  Yes, 300 years is a little too long of a sentence and probably it should be reduced but I will only ask for reduction if he comes out honest in this matter. I will only vouch for him if somebody can elaborate on what he meant by, “You f$#*ed me after age 18, that means you gave consent,” a question that I raised in my earlier post on this thread and that has been asked by many since with no satisfactory answer.  Ajay should either properly justify why he said that OR atleast build his defense saying YES they did have consensual sex but only after 18. He hasn’t done so and until he does that, it puts him behind the suspicion of lying to the jury. His credibility is thus lost and thus jury has sided towards the victim who claim he molested/raped her.

I suggest “advocates for Ajay” to focus on building a better case than getting signatures. Jury has focused on the statement that we have discussed here so they should focus on it as well and prove that yes there had been consensual sex but that was only after age 18 if that is so. If they keep on claiming that he never had sex with the girl I also am not going to sign the petition (I know not a big deal to you) knowing that he made that statement and thus he either lied in the past or is lying now.