I have seen many postings on this and have read few articles already. What I have concluded thus far is that it appears that at the most Ajay might have had consensual sex with the girl, but not rape. I am not sure at what age this happened and if this did happen he should confess, this might make the case easier and his sentence might be significantly reduced. If the sex never happened then why did this conversation take place in the tapped phone:

Juror Blog: In the pretext call, Ajay admitted to having sex with the victim after she was 18. The exact quote is "You f$#*ed me after age 18, that means you gave con

sent". The entire defense was that no sexual relationship occurred and that it was a story made up by the victim. With his admission, that defense was completely disregarded.

The defense’s argument is that what was said is lost in argument. Another blogger even says that a nepali language expert brought in the court concluded that the sentence doesn’t reflect admittance of guilt.

I can only make my final conclusion if I hear actual text of the conversation, specially the part quoted above. I don’t want an innocent man to be jailed, but although her case looks really weak to me- I also don’t want a victim not to get her justice if that really happened. I would sign the petition if somebody can elaborate on the quoted conversation, which was also the decisive proof for the juries.