I admire what Prabal Gurung has achieved and thus made a name for himself. By association, we Nepalese share his fame. By the same token, we do mud ourselves with the infamy of Kaushal Niroula and alike. Separately, their achievement could be viewed as an individual success/failure and we could take a neutral stance. However, as this thread has been marred by glittering censorship, I am befuddled by the responses. As is the case, I can safely deduct that it's not okay to say obscene to the good person while it's alright to say anything to a infamous one. Double standards much??

If there is a censorship, it should be applied evenly. This selective bias mentality maybe a human characteristics but I, for one, do not welcome it. It's all on personal level an individual should apply discretion and moral judgment while making a comment. The worse comes out when people assail others, sometimes rightly, or when someone trolls deliberately. Regardless of the intention, for all intents and purposes, we should judge the poster neutrally. The admin has all the rights to make any move in regards of safeguarding  the integrity of all the people involved. Nevertheless, a  lopsided decision where an unconscious prejudice is evident does more harm than any good. If there is a rule, it should apply for all or none.