I have not followed this case very carefully, but i remember this case very much. As everybody says there is two side of the coin and we did hear the one side, before he was sentenced. Now we are hearning the other side, which seemed to have lot of logic too. Looks like you know lot about the case, I wish you could elaborate more here so you make a stronger point. One of the biggest question that I cannot understand, why in the world an adopted daughter would go in the court and accuses her father about such a big thing. Any behind scenes that we are missing here? If you want more support, then you should be able to explain things that are vague and that need more explanation. We will try to get our voice heard if Mr ajay has strong points against the court.