? 
your fortunes have certainly faded as you show your own lack of intelligence. If your IQ was below 100 I wouldn't be surprised.
Let me break it down for you so that even a dunce like you drooling on the keyboard can understand:
"The
writer talks like this is a good thing. I am not debating whether this
is good or bad but I am merely pointing out the innuendos. We can
debate whether blindly following globalization is good or bad but that would have to be the subject of another article. If you have no idea whether globalization is good or bad, then this would be a good time to look it up and decide for yourself."
I already said the writer doesn't say globalization is good or bad.
Throughout the article the writer states that he doesn't know what will
be the true impact of KFC/McDonald's in Nepal.
Wow! Impressive show of your understanding of English! If you cannot understand the implied meaning of words, then just leave it boy and stick to your elementary school English. You seriously make me laugh when you say that you can't detect what the writer is implying. Of course you can't! It's OK. Not everyone can understand, some have to be dunces like you. Now go home to your mommy haha.
(globalise + localise) "(coining new terms .. I’m not sure journalists are supposed to do this)."
is so funny I would have laughed if you were in elementary school. Just
because you didn't know what globalise (Really good at spelling aren't you? If this is the attention you pay to your thoughts, I don't even want to be talking to you -- it's a waste of my time.) meant doesn't mean the rest of
the world doesn't. Besides, who are you to say who gets to coin a new
term?
Do you even know what journalists are supposed to do? Wait .. of course you don't but you don't care right?? That is because you just want to blanket everything under your own way of thinking. That is way more secure right? Let me educate you: Journalists are not supposed to use obscure terminology and they definitely should not coin new terms. That's the ABC of journalism but you wouldn't know that now would you? I didn't think so.
"(imported chicken – bird flu – why didn’t this ring any bell anywhere in this article? Is our Government seriously thinking of letting foreign fast food chains import live chickens from another country without testing the chickens? Why wasn’t this issue raised in this article which was posted in the website of one of the leading dailies of Nepal?
Why
let them import chickens when our local ones can be used thus giving a
boost for local chicken farmers and thus strengthening the economy of Nepal? What is happening here? Have I gone mad or am I the only one who sees the injustice and stupidity of such a decision?)"
Imported
Chicken, ahhh, bird flu. Your brain, which clearly lacks any form of
processing, actually thought they were bringing in live chickens from
Brazil? LOL. How do you know they were not bringing processed chicken?
Your second point of why not use local chickens is valid and the only
thing notable in your ganalysis (ganauke + analysis).
Big chain stores like Walmart, KFC, Pizza-hut etc hurt small stores and restaurants and some communities in the US are trying to ban such chains from their areas because many people depend on such small stores for a living. I am not saying they are bad but they do have side-effects on the local community and I seriously hope there has been enough research done and backup plans made ready back in Nepal just in case something goes wrong"
This is nothing new. We all know big business killing local stores but hey it's free market!
I rest my case guys. What can I say after reading the above line? The sheer stupidity uggh.When you have the listening and reading skills to seriously debate, then come and we will debate this issue.
GarbageGigo