Posted by: kanchu! October 31, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
PIRE you should have read my 5 lines- answer is there. Who should lead the country is subjective questions but who are bright and brilliant is not subjective.
btw, how many of first bench people in the context of Nepal go for to study -liberal arts? perhaps none and currently who are running the country are the same-economists, anhtropologits and social scientits.
Doc and engr-just like ordinary lebour like dakarmi or nakarmi? you kidding me???- that is a typical loser mentality-no offense-last benchers thinking and typical nepali neta thinking. you must of one of those rit?
if you are economists, then tell me were you really wanted to be economists? did you score more than 80% in SLC or 45%? did you joined ARTS college in-spite of your 85% in SLC? yes I know there are few who would chose the profession irrespective of their grades and etc and I salute them. but if not, then stop being hypocrite here.
my very point is, if you edge out first benchers, brilliant and bright then it will never yeild anything good. What you study is of course secondary thing ( i pointed out some category based on my personal experience and to correct the wrong notion that all those who come in US are bright-that is not correct- what is true is that US has lot of options for third benches too and they who would never even think of going back to nepal are the real losers and incapable one) so i do not agree all those who are in US are capable.
Education always judges whether you are best or not, so does your grade speak in every level whether you are hard working or not. If you do not agree with this notion, then better not go for formal education. They can follow the track of maoists cadre.
btw, how many of first bench people in the context of Nepal go for to study -liberal arts? perhaps none and currently who are running the country are the same-economists, anhtropologits and social scientits.
Doc and engr-just like ordinary lebour like dakarmi or nakarmi? you kidding me???- that is a typical loser mentality-no offense-last benchers thinking and typical nepali neta thinking. you must of one of those rit?
if you are economists, then tell me were you really wanted to be economists? did you score more than 80% in SLC or 45%? did you joined ARTS college in-spite of your 85% in SLC? yes I know there are few who would chose the profession irrespective of their grades and etc and I salute them. but if not, then stop being hypocrite here.
my very point is, if you edge out first benchers, brilliant and bright then it will never yeild anything good. What you study is of course secondary thing ( i pointed out some category based on my personal experience and to correct the wrong notion that all those who come in US are bright-that is not correct- what is true is that US has lot of options for third benches too and they who would never even think of going back to nepal are the real losers and incapable one) so i do not agree all those who are in US are capable.
Education always judges whether you are best or not, so does your grade speak in every level whether you are hard working or not. If you do not agree with this notion, then better not go for formal education. They can follow the track of maoists cadre.