I am not sure where to begin here...

1.  His wife never mentions that he admitted to having a sexual relationship in the recorded phone call.

2.  She does not  mention that the birthdate on the passport issue was brought about from her husband or one of his close family members in Nepal. 

3.  She got back to the US by doing exactly what the US Embassy told her to do.  If she had to lie about something to get back in to the US, she did it.  She did what they told her to do and said what they told her to say.

4.  As far as the boyfriend breaking upo with her...  you need to know that she moved out of the Dev home 2 months before and thought she was free of him.  He went and searched out her boyfirends name, address, phone numbers, everything and began contacting him.  He harrassed the boyfriend so much that he finally broke up with her to get Ajay away from himself.  It was the straw that broke the camels back!

5.  The nurse practitioner who saw the victim over the years admitted she never did a pelvic exam on the victim.  She also admitted on the stand that rapes are usually not something they find evidence of unless it was a violent rape and there is trauma or damage done.  There was none of this.

6.  The wife mentions allowing her to stay out late and live a free life (or how ever she puts it).  She admitted on the stand that  the victim was out past curfew one night and she went and found her.  On the way home, the victim was slapped and left with a cut on her face.

 

I had already mentioned that the victims testimony was hard to believe at times and yes, there was a claim of rapes 3-5 times a week for 5  years.  He was not charged with that many and was not found guilty of that many. Had it not been for the phone call and other pieces of evidence, he would be free.  We only actually used parts of her testimony when other evidence collaborated something she said.  (Like the hotel receipts  from a hotel a few blocks from his house where she claims an attack.  Why woudl a man get a hotel room just a few blocks from his home)

I personally see this statement as a way to get her husband more support since obviously the people he had come to court did not do the trick.  He is the bread winner in the family and her financial livelyhood is at stake.

We will see on August 7th if the Judge agrees with us or not.........