I would doubt that Jurors would come here and say anything about appeal filed by Ajay's wife as this will be another court matter where different Juror's would have to go and look at the evidence presented.....

In the appeal letter presented above, i did not find anywhere that mentioned about the recorded phone conversation between Ajay and the victim where Ajay admitted having consensual sex not once but twice according to Jurors. Had there not present the recorded phone conversation, Ajay could have been a free man...

Regarding forgery case of the victim in Nepal, I am  not sure why Ajay's relative needs to report the wrong dob to authority. Forgery case like this in Nepal is debatable and i think it practical in Nepal....... who would commit this kind of forgery through whom is also debatable.....