Posted by: no_quiero July 7, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Margaret court , 62 Grand Slams including 24 singles.
Rod Laver who lost 5 glorious years, but still his winning percentage of grand slam was phenomenal. Had he not lost those five years only god knows what record he would have had. He won all the four grand slams for two years. Only player to do so.
Roger is a legend but so does these two who I think are on par. While Andre Agassi brands Laver's Slams a "Godlike" achievement. Rod Laver himself thinks that if Roger continues this way he will be the greatest of all time in everybody's mind.
Rod Laver who lost 5 glorious years, but still his winning percentage of grand slam was phenomenal. Had he not lost those five years only god knows what record he would have had. He won all the four grand slams for two years. Only player to do so.
Roger is a legend but so does these two who I think are on par. While Andre Agassi brands Laver's Slams a "Godlike" achievement. Rod Laver himself thinks that if Roger continues this way he will be the greatest of all time in everybody's mind.
Last edited: 07-Jul-09 05:04 AM