I was so scared that whatever feeling i had in my mind about union of Nepal and India is just me. deshbhaktanepali and mcmxc, you guys can count me in.

Skimmese would be in very pathetic position had they not been annexed by India. I dont hear Indian Police and Army ( from rest of the india) raping and killing skimmese. They are proud indians and yet genuine skimmese. They are more able to preserve their heritage now then they were when they were ruled by their king.

Being part of india is not same as being its colony. We become India's citizens.

People from places like Dolpa and Humla can finally see a motorized vechile in their lifetime plying in their districts. People like us who are among 'elite' Nepalese( using a computer itself make u an elite nepalese) can compete with the rest of the Indians on many oppurtunities India has to offer.

Nepalese can be proud of their country not just for sagarmatha and gautam buddha. BTW sagarmatha being located in nepalese border and buddha happen to born in lumbini doesnt make nepal great, right?

Disadvantages might happen to our netas who might come under central govt scrunity, some big media houses like Kantipur whose monopoly might end after india times start a new nepali paper, to big officers in police, army n nijamati for the same reason as for netas, to illicit and corrupted business like transporters who stop plying their vechile when govt decide to lower the fares, to 20 to 30-member ethnic party who have ability to do nepal-bandh by having a news-piece published in Kantipur.

and to the would be DV-Lottery winners( guess what?  u r dis qualified. LOL.the last one was only for fun)

We should have this debate going on in sajha. One Pakistani once said, "Guess how powerful India and Pakistan would be if they are not spending all their money in defending themselves from one another but creating a greater country keeping religion well aside. India-Pakistan re-union would harm only harliners on both sides but would benefit whole majority of commoners".