In regard to current political situation in Nepal, I have some questions and I wish (that is best I could do) Supreme Prachanda and his courtier (Mr. Doctor, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Gajurel or anyone who is listening) answers them to help me understand them better.

1.       Why did Prachanda resign when he says time and again that Maoist will not tolerate foreign (read India) interference in Nepal’s internal affairs? Wasn’t it better to fight against such atrocities being in power?

2.       Why did he not follow the normal procedures of multiparty democracy and face no-confidence motion? Don’t you think it would have given them more support in general public and would have exposed other parties?

3.       When will they understand the basic norms of multi-party democracy system? It is not the biggest party but the party and leader with maximum support in the parliament get to make the government. Surya Bahadur Thapa, Lokendra Bahadur Chanda in Nepal and Chandra Sekhar, B. P. Singh and H. D. Devegauda in India were Prime Minister in the past following the same theory. How is the current case in Nepal different?

4.       If they were so much concerned against 3^rd largest party forming a government then why did they make an offer to support MJF which is just the forth largest party and has appeal just in some part of Terai (Madesh)? Was it just one more strategic maneuver?

5.       Why they were so much against Army Chief Katwal and in favor of Khadka when they both were retiring in next 6 month anyway? If the video we saw a month ago was thing of the past then why such urgency? What was the ulterior motive behind it?

Thank you for your response. I truly appreciate them in advance.