Posted by: kanchu! April 21, 2009
THE ORIGIN OF HINDU RELIGION
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

THIS IS WHY I DO NOT BUY ARYAN INVASION THEORY BECAUSE IT IS BACKED BY SO CALLEDWESTERN SCHOLARS  ALWSAYS TRY TO SHOW THEIR SUPREMACY BY FORCING PEOPLE TO BELIVE THAT ARYAN WERE INDO EUROPEAN TRIBE....

While east were in the period RIG VEDA, MOHENZODARO AND VEDIC CIVILIZATION they were still in STONE HENGE CULTURE- are they kidding me???

READ THIS ANOTHER PIECE- YOU BUY IT! MANY EASTERN SCHOLARS DENY IT


The RIG VEDA translated by Ralph
T.H. Griffith, 1889. Peter Myers, January 15, 2002; update September 7,
2008. My comments are shown {thus}.




The Greeks acquired civilization from Egypt, the Phoenicians, Babylon
etc., i.e. the "Aryan myth" that Civilization is Aryan is wrong.



The Aryans were nomadic tribal peoples, barbarian invaders. They learned
civilization from the people they conquered, in India, Iran and the Mediterranean.



But there was an Aryan invasion. The name for Persia, "Iran",
is derived from the word "aryan", as is the word "Eire",
the name of Ireland. The Brahmins of India still call themselves "aryan".



The Aryans invaded Western Europe, but they formed a ruling class, an
aristocracy, not the whole body of the people. They imposed their languages,
as Hungary and Turkey received non-Indo-European languages by invasion
(Finland perhaps too).



Spencer Wells is a Geneticist, Director of the Genographic Project.
In his book The Journey of Man, he shows that Europe's ancestry
derives mainly from people in that continent around 30,000 years ago; not
from early agriculturalists in the Middle East. He discovered a genetic
marker, M17, which is the signature of the Aryan invaders from the steppe
into east & central Europe and northern India: 

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article