As I said, there are several school of thoughts this is one of the many

Facts
which cast serious doubt on the Aryan
Invasion Theory

•
There is no evidence of an Aryan homeland
outside of India mentioned anywhere
in the Vedas. On the contrary, the Vedas
speak of the mighty Sarasvati River
and other places indigenous to India.
To date, no evidence for a foreign intrusion
has been found, neither archaeological,
linguistic, cultural nor genetic.

•
There are more than 2,500 Archaeological
sites, two-thirds of which are along
the recently discovered dried up Sarasvati
River bed. These sites show a cultural
continuity with the Vedic literature
from the early Harrapan civilization
up to the present day India.

The
archaeological sites along the dried
up Sarasvati River basin are represented
by black dots.

•
Several independent studies of the drying
up of the Sarasvati River bed, all indicate
the same time period of 1,900 B.C.E.

•
The significance of establishing this
date for the drying up of the Sarasvati
River is, that it pushes the date for
the composition of the Rig Veda back
to approximately 3,000 B.C.E., as enunciated
by the Vedic tradition itself.

•
The late dating of the Vedic literatures
by indologists is based on speculated
dates of 1,500 B.C.E. for the Aryan
Invasion and 1,200 B.C.E. for the Rig
Veda, both now disproved by scientific
evidence.

Max
Muller, the principal architect of the
Aryan Invasion theory, admitted the
purely speculative nature of his Vedic
chronology, and in his last work published
shortly before his death, The Six
Systems of Indian Philosophy, he
wrote: "Whatever may be the date
of the Vedic hymns, whether 15 hundred
or 15,000 B.C.E., they have their own
unique place and stand by themselves
in the literature of the world."