Kanchu, i see where you are pointing to. But please do not make that mistake. As far as i can see you are only going along with the manuscripts. Ok fine because manuscripts do mentions the names, places and events  including the dates. But one ought to know this that we cannot depend too
much on the manuscripts. After all the manuscripts in veranasi, kerala and chennai are written by the brahmins of india.
So there tends to be lot of bias against ancient tribes of India whom were non-aryan race. We have to understand that these manuscripts are written by the same people who created the caste system.

Let me quote you from the Reg-Vedas, the holiest script of the Hindus.
 "The Bahun was born from the mouth, the Chetri from the arms, the Vaishya from the thighs and the Sudhra from the foot".
So how can one believe this doctrine??  If we are to follow the manuscripts, then we should be asking to what extend should we believe?

Dood you are saying to some extend that the scholars are showing biasness. You even said western scholars. How can you show so much remorse against these scholars. And let me tell you, not all the scholars are western. In my study and to my knowldege, they are also well-known Indian as well as Nepalese scholars who have done an extensive research and penned down their findings. Surely the mixture of scholars couldn't be wrong unlike the manuscripts you are going with.

And just to tell you that this website <http://www.tripura.org.in/origin.htm> on
The Origin of Tripuri People are  not run by foreigners and
 these same Tripuri people are not foreigners themselves but the natives of India.

You claim mine is a theory. Well prove it dear Kanchu. Todays world is run by science. Science is fact. It's real and does not discriminate anyone anything.

From the point of archeology work, the skulls found of Harappa and Mahenjo-daro belonged to proto-australoid, Mongoloid, Mediterranean and Alpine races but no skull was found of from the site of excavation belonging to Aryan people.
This clearly proved that the mongoloid were the natives of Indus civilisation along with the proto-australoid , mediterranean and alpine races.


Neolithic tools found in the Kathmandu Valley indicate that people have been living in the Himalayan region for at least 9,000 years and along with other ancient texts, it appears that Kirant ethnicity people were living in this region. This is according to "A Country Study: Nepal". Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/frd/cs/nptoc.html

This proves that they were already other races in then ancient india (indian sub-continent) before the advent of aryan. When scholars refers ancient india, Nepal is included because boundary did not exist then.
Therefore Kancha how can you just pushed aside the natives of ancient india and disregard them as though there weren't there at the first place.
But if you agree to acknowledge that Aryan race only came to indus valley later on, (some time around 1700 BC), then one clearly have the idea of religions and practices influnce of these ancient tribes on the later race.

Thanks for your book suggestion. I will no doubt try to read it. Anything that is helpful to my major study is good.

xxx,
       jpg