JPEG,
The thing I wrote above are not my theroy, like you are doing now, I did have the opportunity to research about Indus, Vedic and their relation to civilization of the rest of the world and it was almost more than 10 years ago, nor I do clearly remember the books we read, but we did read lot of manuscripts, if you go to varanasi, some are in Kerala and Chennai,  you will still find many of those intact in their library. Amzaingly, in Nepal, "thayasphu" you will get to read lot of manuscripts. We discovered there were clear conflicts between Dravida doctrine and aryan doctrine, you may know dravida who constructed famous temples in the later part of histroy while they were ruling clan of south india and their doctrine was to deny north indian invasion in india are still  based upon " anti-bramhin" sentiment, and you can still see that conflict in current indian politics.

Wester Scholars while tried to impose that as if Aryan belong to "east/central" europe easter scholars are arguing as if the whole civilization belong one particular group. That is what your posting tries to dipict as well. As a matter of fact-like I said in my earlier post "civilization is passage of time" you need to understand " Mohenzodaro" and "harappan" civilization declined not because of aryan invasion-there might have been some external /internal conflicts which I am denying but they were declined because of  people in a process discovered " most fertile land and suitable climate" towards east. Which led them move towards east.

Coming back to hinduism, there are many branches and doctrines which were evolved later and in theier early stages there are total interconnection, sharing and conflicts amongst them. Still now these conflicts exists. But denying one group or prtotraying one group as a guard and other as an evil, does not really justify the truth. If you go to japan and china, you will be amazed to see the god and godess in their musuem are named after both hindu/vedic god and budhha goddess. So hte influence of these civilization had enormous impact and well spreaded, which also left lot of people to wonder, research and some time logical conjecture. We will see more and more discovery in a days to come but as for me I can not deny one's presence and contribution in the history as most religiously biased and western scholars do.

Very recently there has been on genetic research conducted in kerala in dravida community which proved that they are originated from africa. Based on this, some are eager to deny the presence and contribution of dravida to the development of hindu tradtion, but scholars well proved that the interconnection amongst non western civilization. What I can tell you from my experince is that the more you will read the more you will find interconnection amonst various easter civilizations which are either linked to indus/vedic civilizaiton or buddhism ( not necessarily shakya buddha..there were many before him, like "wipaspi" who is often linked civilization of KTM but hindu believe it was krishna). I find it very fascinating.

Again, some historians do keep deny or keep secret  either because they want to their own cast/ religion to flourish and this has also happened in the history. This is why current they modern historians believe in physical evidences and manuscripts. For example if someone say there was not any " nepal sambhat" in the history, it was the " pashupati bhattaraka" sambhat which they are refering to newars would kill them but as most the historians know this fact there was not any such "nepal sambhat" nor any proofs even a myth that "sankha dhar shakwa" was savior. This is why anthropology and history become intersting.

Share your knowlegde and keep posting.

Thanks