Posted by: dekchidriver March 27, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Nas bro,
Since you seem to be taking words a bit too literally here's my rebuttal at your s :) don't mind :
"The extent of their privacy is only a google search away". Not really. Files stored on servers (mostly running linux) have access permissions to read, write and execute. Whether it be facebook, hi5, orkut or whichever site. Deep down inside the files that are stored on the server have specific rules for who can access them. Just because you upload a file on the 'internet' does NOT mean that the remaining 6 billion people can freely access it. AND IT DEFINITELY DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU UPLOADED THT FILE TO SHARE IT WITH THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD.
Take flickr for example. They let you choose who you want to show your pictures to: friends, family, friends AND family, or TO THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. And even when you have the option to show to the WHOLE WIDE WORLD, even then you have licensing attributes.
Google spiderbots dont go where they are not allowed. You can script your .htaccess file to keep these buggers out so that google wont even be aware that some file exists. Google != omnipotent.
Since at the time of your pictures your claim was that these pictures were from hi5,fb it was a matter of concern because of people like you, I wont be able to see how my girl friend spent her week in Hawaii.
But you've corrected yourself and told us that the whole hi5,fb was a lie (why would you wanna lie abt something like this?) I guess its not much of an issue if these beautiful women wanted to be admired by the WHOLE WIDE WORLD OF SAJHA.
Lastly, just because FB owns the pictures uploaded to it, does not by any length give YOU the authority to distribute what is theirs, unless you are related to Mark Zuckerburg.
My bottom line sir, is that please respect these beautiful people and dont do anything that they wouldn't want you to do :D
Thats all. Have a great weekend.
Since you seem to be taking words a bit too literally here's my rebuttal at your s :) don't mind :
"The extent of their privacy is only a google search away". Not really. Files stored on servers (mostly running linux) have access permissions to read, write and execute. Whether it be facebook, hi5, orkut or whichever site. Deep down inside the files that are stored on the server have specific rules for who can access them. Just because you upload a file on the 'internet' does NOT mean that the remaining 6 billion people can freely access it. AND IT DEFINITELY DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU UPLOADED THT FILE TO SHARE IT WITH THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD.
Take flickr for example. They let you choose who you want to show your pictures to: friends, family, friends AND family, or TO THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. And even when you have the option to show to the WHOLE WIDE WORLD, even then you have licensing attributes.
Google spiderbots dont go where they are not allowed. You can script your .htaccess file to keep these buggers out so that google wont even be aware that some file exists. Google != omnipotent.
Since at the time of your pictures your claim was that these pictures were from hi5,fb it was a matter of concern because of people like you, I wont be able to see how my girl friend spent her week in Hawaii.
But you've corrected yourself and told us that the whole hi5,fb was a lie (why would you wanna lie abt something like this?) I guess its not much of an issue if these beautiful women wanted to be admired by the WHOLE WIDE WORLD OF SAJHA.
Lastly, just because FB owns the pictures uploaded to it, does not by any length give YOU the authority to distribute what is theirs, unless you are related to Mark Zuckerburg.
My bottom line sir, is that please respect these beautiful people and dont do anything that they wouldn't want you to do :D
Thats all. Have a great weekend.