prabhat...

i have question for u...how do you rate a batsman...u dont even want to go with average..not even with centuries they score and most surprisingly u dont even considered those players who has won more games for the country to be the greatest...so whats your opinion on the greatest..u haven't seen bradman or viv richard play and yet put them on top two..talking about bowlers and batsman...i dont think they had quality bowlers like wasim waqar walsh around those time too...bradmans era was almost the new era of cricket....during vivs time windies was reigning the world..so obviously he had some confident on attacking like gilchrist had when aussies were reigning..that way gilchrist will pass out on vivs...agree with you on lara sachin and inzmam..and yeah talking about inzamam being underrated how about andy flower...isnt he the most talented batsman and also underated considering the fact that he had to play for the underdogs. why you rate ricky ponting as the best..after all he has all the quality that lara has..he is explosive and has always been explosive. what about yousuf youhana...and taking the fact for statistic..just look at the strike rate of lara and tendulkar...

and yes even all cricket pundits and people who knows cricket considers michael as one of the all time best in the business