Hari dai.............small information is dangerous and I despise your view of thinking bringing nationality in the issue.  You are trying to justify the act of YCL. Shame on you. Stop calling Pashupati nath a Nepalese temple and badrinath an Indian temple. Those are all Hindu temple.  I visited two temples of india where i have seen  nepalese priest. Also in 2 of the top temple of UK made by Indians ,(south hall and woolwich) one of the top priest is Nepalese. Please know this following fact,

1. Pashupati nath is a hindu temple (not india or nepali)  and only deserved hindu priest should be allowed irrespective of nationality. And if you know all this saga is because of the method of selection.

2. The government has once again given continuation to the TIKE  prawriti.  The newly appointed priest doesn't have any knowledge of the parampara of pashupatinath. His knowledge and qualification doesn't match the selection criteria.प्रतिष्पर्धा गराए पुजारी नियुक्ती गरेको भए यसको पक्कै स्वागत हुने नै थियो । त्यसलाइ स्विकार गर्न भण्डारीहरु पनि नतमस्तक हुने थिए ।

3.  The government intervention to religion is completely uncalled for. Relgion is a senstitive issue and this maoist led government has again failed.