Hitler vs Prachanda. If you want to compare them, go to Holocast Museum, read the captions and descriptions on the photographs on the wall. Here are summaries:

1. After WW I, the political parties were not able to do what they were supposed to do as democratic leaders of the country. Just the way we had situation in Nepal, after 1990 movement. The democracy was in trouble, not able to deliver.

2. Hitler formed a "political party" and SA later SS. It got 38% vote, just like CPNM got 38% in election (what a co-incidence). The President in Germany seems to have bargained something in return for appointing Hitler as chanceler. The way Girija brought Prachanda and kicked out Gyanendra in return of favor for appointing Girija for President, unfortunately it did not happen, because Prachanda like Hitler used Girija and dumped him later. Hitler established SA just like Prachanda established YCL.

3. Hitler used SA (/SS) to settle score with communists first, and later to ruin the country, particularly Jews. Prachanda used YCL to those who go against Maoists. Hitler had propaganda minister, just like Prachanda has Mahara as propaganda minister.