Posted by: MR_TRUTH January 2, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
nepe wrote:
maoist
The result of which is that they are clueless as far as economic transformation of Nepal is concerned. Prachanda has been saying that he could not do much because of the lack of co-operation from all sides (kaam garna diyenan !). He is telling the truth.
monarchy
For those who still think monarchy was sustainable, useful or necessary, if realpolitik consoles in any way, the fact is that, in politics, to be successful is what matters. Monarchy in its traditional form did not make it.
these are two contradictory statements to each other , what I have been calling a drive by argument to the needy although I second the one `` successful is what matters´´. Who knows what went through in the daily diplomatic undiplomatic world of politics as kings were silent all the time in the name of ever increasing unpopular legacy while Prachanda was constantly yapping even when someone poke his nose inorder to elevate ever hiding image in the name of transparency. Until we know the whole truth, benefit of doubt should be applied to both sides or better `` successful is what matters´´ to all. I despise excuses without any consolation, period! let alone to pray miracle in the circles of intoxicated maoists.
Miracle has already happend in Nepal in my opinion to some extent, like propotional election outcome with exactly opposite anticipated results to related parties otherwise hawaldar Girija had already stamped the country to so called ``jana ganatantra´´ with first election plan. Whoever the perfomer is , shall be given the rest. Country may need it again for fast and furious forthcoming caste based republic Nepal, who knows ?
maoist
The result of which is that they are clueless as far as economic transformation of Nepal is concerned. Prachanda has been saying that he could not do much because of the lack of co-operation from all sides (kaam garna diyenan !). He is telling the truth.
monarchy
For those who still think monarchy was sustainable, useful or necessary, if realpolitik consoles in any way, the fact is that, in politics, to be successful is what matters. Monarchy in its traditional form did not make it.
these are two contradictory statements to each other , what I have been calling a drive by argument to the needy although I second the one `` successful is what matters´´. Who knows what went through in the daily diplomatic undiplomatic world of politics as kings were silent all the time in the name of ever increasing unpopular legacy while Prachanda was constantly yapping even when someone poke his nose inorder to elevate ever hiding image in the name of transparency. Until we know the whole truth, benefit of doubt should be applied to both sides or better `` successful is what matters´´ to all. I despise excuses without any consolation, period! let alone to pray miracle in the circles of intoxicated maoists.
Miracle has already happend in Nepal in my opinion to some extent, like propotional election outcome with exactly opposite anticipated results to related parties otherwise hawaldar Girija had already stamped the country to so called ``jana ganatantra´´ with first election plan. Whoever the perfomer is , shall be given the rest. Country may need it again for fast and furious forthcoming caste based republic Nepal, who knows ?