Posted by: no_quiero October 18, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Prabhat K , your statement of "Shane Warne is obviously a better critic than me or you, he is Wisden's top 5 cricketers of the century " is false. Shane warne's top 50 is very prejudiced and many expert dont even give it a s**t and said it is just plain rubbish. Just look at his top 50 ,
Players like tim may, Jamie Siddons (i never heard of this player), ravi shastri, alec stewart gets in the list.
I am sure Shane warne must have some reason for not including players like Inzamam Ul haq in the top 50. Do you really believe Inzamam wasnt even top 50 player in his generation? Do you see any logic behind putting Shoaib Akhter well ahead of Alan Donald. Do you really believe batsman like Mark Taylor is better than matthew Hayden and is there any logic behind putting taylor at number 9.
Players like tim may, Jamie Siddons (i never heard of this player), ravi shastri, alec stewart gets in the list.
I am sure Shane warne must have some reason for not including players like Inzamam Ul haq in the top 50. Do you really believe Inzamam wasnt even top 50 player in his generation? Do you see any logic behind putting Shoaib Akhter well ahead of Alan Donald. Do you really believe batsman like Mark Taylor is better than matthew Hayden and is there any logic behind putting taylor at number 9.