? 
Now there is a ray of light on the horizon.. See the see below. At lease USCIS knows what the heck is happening here.
Government study finds H-1B visa fraud
USCIS
finds 27 percent rate of fraud in the H-1B visa program, including
paying low wages, forging documents, and misrepresenting jobs
A U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services [USCIS] study, H-1B Benefit Fraud & Compliance Assessment published in September but just coming to light this month, found a 27 percent rate of fraud in the H-1B visa program.
InfoWorld Podcast
Top storage trends and IT consolidation strategies
Sponsored by Sony
The study, conducted by The Office of Fraud Detection and National Security [FDNS], drew 246 cases in a random sampling of the 96,827 "approved, denied or pending I-129 petitions" for employment of a non-immigrant worker filed between October 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. Employers hiring IT professionals under the H-1B visa program must fill out an I-129 petition as well as an LCA [Labor Condition Application].
In order to insure that the applicants could be interviewed for the study, the BFCA looked at those seeking to extend their existing H-1B non-immigrant status or those who were seeking new employment as an H-1B nonimmigrant while living in the U.S. in another non-immigrant visa status.
The study found two types of fraud, "willful misrepresentation, falsification, or omission of a material fact" and a second type where there was no willful fraud, but "there was evidence that the employer or alien beneficiary failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations."
However, although some of the "technical" violations were minor infractions, the description of some of the "technical" violations appear to be serious breaches in the regulations.
For example, there were instances where "the employer failed to pay the beneficiary at least the prevailing wage for the particular occupation in the specific geographical location as noted and attested to on the LCA filed with the Department of Labor."
Another violation that was considered technical was the employer charging back to the petitioner the filing fees the employer was obligated to pay, according to the regulations.
The study said this practice had the effect of "lowering the beneficiary's wages to less than the required prevailing wage."
The most blatant misrepresentation cited by the study was in a case where the H-1B visa worker "was performing duties that were significantly different from those described on the LCA and I-129 petition."
In this particular case, an IT professional hired as a "business development analyst" was found to be "working in a Laundromat doing laundry and maintaining washing machines."