Ha Ha Ha, Nepe, your comment is witty. At times, you struggle hard to claim that you intend to present independent analysis and fair judgement. But, you know, I often find it funny because your judgement are not as fair as you claim.

When you say, “जनगणतन्त्र” के हो ?........................... माओवादी: नाजवाफ, that is the gist of the above article. But you can not draw analogy of this quest with other parties like UML and Congress by saying
“जनताको बहुदलिय जनवाद” के हो ?..... एमाले: नाजवाफ
“समाजवाद” के हो ?............................. नेपाली कांग्रेस: नाजवाफ
because you know they have plenty of stuffs to describe “जनताको बहुदलिय जनवाद” or “समाजवाद”. BP and many of his followers have  spent enormous time and effort documenting and clarifying what is their “समाजवाद”. UML has devoted a whole convention and have spent enourmous effort to parrot their cadres about “जनताको बहुदलिय जनवाद”. You may agree or disagree, but both of them do have a clear picture of their agenda and I do not feel they are lost whenever they talk about their agenda. But the story of “जनगणतन्त्र” is totally different. They are even unable to answer a journalist, unable to clearly state what additional component would bring by their (in)famous “जन” added before the obvious (or bourgeois) “गणतन्त्र”. They don't have a document on it, they don't have a thorough discussion on it.

Just I wonder, how could you see such a pitiful bankruptcy of idea of “जनगणतन्त्र” is similar to other ones from your independent and fair judging brains? Are you using your “जन”brain here?