I have found the above analysis a very good, "based on fact" analysis, because I have been following the news and activities related to ANMIN in Nepal, its role, its suspicious meeting with the Terai based separatist groups in India, protest from a sector of Nepali society, even by India ( I don't know why), news relating to UNDP's "food for work" program misused by UN for the terrorist sects of terai, ect. More importantly, I know that Ian Martin is a person who is from UK, worked in Amnesty International before (you know what Amnesty International does in fact right?), his role in East Timor was also controversial.