Posted by: fortunefaded June 21, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
'What Yadav did was not the solution' is what most people against Yadav's action have been voicing.
You are right in the sense that if we just lock up corrupts inside toilets in the long run, then we won't be any corruption-free than now.
But Yadav got what he wanted. He got the media attention......I would be more shameful to be in Ghimire's position right now than Yadav's shoes. And he got to humiliate Ghimire.
For what's bad? To be known as a ghusyaa LDO who repeatedly ignored a miniter's order, upsetting the locals in the area and was locked up in a toilet for the utterly asinine behavior.....or to be called a 'jungali' Minister, using somewhat unlawful measure (I don't even know if it is a crime at all) to show the evil corruption that is draining our country day by day, garnering an anti-corrupt name tag under his belt.
I would go with the latter. What do you think?
You are right in the sense that if we just lock up corrupts inside toilets in the long run, then we won't be any corruption-free than now.
But Yadav got what he wanted. He got the media attention......I would be more shameful to be in Ghimire's position right now than Yadav's shoes. And he got to humiliate Ghimire.
For what's bad? To be known as a ghusyaa LDO who repeatedly ignored a miniter's order, upsetting the locals in the area and was locked up in a toilet for the utterly asinine behavior.....or to be called a 'jungali' Minister, using somewhat unlawful measure (I don't even know if it is a crime at all) to show the evil corruption that is draining our country day by day, garnering an anti-corrupt name tag under his belt.
I would go with the latter. What do you think?
Last edited: 21-Jun-08 11:55 AM