? 
Jharekopaat,
I applaud your recent comment. It sounds great!
I don't think Nepal still bans (after house declaration 2 years ago on secularism) on the Christianity and buliding up of the churches. If the state actually banned, it should have been illegal way back. I support that they should be allowed. But my take on the entire posting is that as long as the Evangelists and Mulsims are driving their proselytizing efforts (in converting others' religion with various means--power, money, and enticements, and which is a reality as well) Nepal should remain a Hindu state to protect the culture of her majority of citizens, but still should allow others to operate their religious functionaries as long as they guarantee that they don't convert others by external means.
In your next question: I would not convert myself because I think I am educated and financially better off than most of our folks in the remote villages. But all are not necessarily like me. Those poor people who are illiterate and are living in abject poverty might convert if an evangelist comes and offers them a handful of amount or enticement or threat or any other means. I would appreciate every christians living in Nepal if they had had belief like yours: "Christianity is all about faith", but the irony is that your so called "Tycoon Exporters" and sponsors of "Religion" are exporting faith in the way that McDonnald expotrts franchise! Are you aware of that? Do you believe that Faith can be exported like BigMac?