So, my take for the future of Nepal with Maoist at the driving seat, if that is what we are seeing, is.

Democracy: intact and strengthened instead

Economy: Capitalism with a symbolic tilt to socialism

Foreign relation: Less submissive to India and more diversified (globalized)

So, I am optimistic and less alarmed than many of us.

Nepe

Democracy: intact and strengthened instea

Believe me or not I wish maoist goood luck but how they can give freedom, democracy, capitilist society and still  can acheive the prolitatrate dream. Take an example of cuba, those revolutionaries were well intended people with high morale but after all they cannot give their people full democracy fearing outside influence or fearing they might loose what they have acheived. This happens when party works so hard to build nation but people can stilll hold power to throw them without any big reason. Democracy gives equal chances to wrong doers not only right doers, that's the problem. Maoist Baburam has said repeatedly, "multi party is just a vehical for them". P path may be  sincere ideology but it cannot be no more than current chinese system.

every system soughts socialism in one way or another in less more form , the real issue is how they gonna fulfill the promise they made to their comrades about prolitatrate society with zero in hand while pleasing business bankers lanlord industrial mass with full property right at the same time. Those people in cantonment  I always hear them on tv singing this dream like a parrot. Prachand path may be new theory yet to be tested but those dream must be fulfilled first or  get no base support. I could have understand P Path better if Prachanda was a Bill gates  but the last time I heard him  about raising capital was with selling yarchagumba. Are they talking about prolitatrate society  just in terms of equal justice  system? If not then it is highly likely that there are  two kinds of P Path in writing and circulation. Even Chavez's state oil company is on the brink of collapse pls read independent analysis.

"Foreign relation: Less submissive to India and more diversified (globalized"

I agree it will be less submissive to india but it is in conflict with your hand in hand approach in the previous thread. so less submissive is good for you now? and how on earth diversification, globalization can be acheived when P Path is backward, into ethnic based republic?

enlighten me nepe guru here. I'm kind of ignorant.