I fully agree with gyanguru ji's analysis. NC benefited
from the split in left votes between the UML and the Maoists. If the two left
parties had formed an alliance NC would been thrown into the dustbin of
history. The same fate would have befallen NC if the party had not merged back
in October (good timing). From the results thus far the UML probably would have
benefited more from the left alliance esp in Kathmandu-2 & Rautahat-6 The election results suggest,
for better or for worse, that
I think this election will lead to a major re-alignment of party politics in
As for the UML, it is no longer the ONLY dominant legitimate left party. That
will certainly lead to an identity crisis, and my guess is that until the party
finds a new way to position itself between the Maoists (leftist nationalist)
and NC (rightist India-suckers), it will not be able to return to its old
status - it could possibly fold into the Maoist camp.
The election results also show that parties based purely on ethnicity and
region have not fared well except perhaps MPRF which is good for the country in
the long-run. This suggests that the major parties have been able to co-opt
ethnic & regional votes (btw I am a Janajati myself); obviously more work
is needed on the madheshi front. I kind of disagree (given the election
results) with gyanguru ji's view that if madhesi
parties had formed an alliance, they would have swept the region because
wherever MPRF have won, the 2nd and 3rd place holders are either NC, UML or
Maoists. The RPPs, the RJPs and all the alphabet soup of parties will now cease
to exist in any viable form but there will be jokers in those parties who
run in elections.
I will repeat my mantra, "so far so good, let's see what happens
next".
Jai