thanks for the summary of the interview. I would really want to know the source of this information, and especially aamir's statement that srk is second to him.
ani btw, lets set the rules clear. what are the criteria of comparison between shahrukh n aamir?

•  the number of movies that were commercially successful only in urban areas of India?
• the amount of money their movies make in the 1st wk of release?
• the brand name of banners they work with count?
• number of awards won . (lets only count filmfare and national award of india)

I aint including "acting capability" as a criteria coz its too subjective and hence cant be judged for certainty. if there b any rule of thumb to measure "acting capability" pls include it was well n explain me how the "rule of thumb" is applied.

i dunno what was ur gf's judgement criteria "hips dont lie? dude. bt  for me, srk is someone to be inspired of.

what im concerned is, srk didnt have a family background of movie personality as aamir did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahir_Hussain
who would go on producing a movie for his son when his career was bleak
srk stood up and struggled on his own, and has rose to a point where he is compared with the Amitabh Bachchan.

im not saying that aamir khan is bad. i enjoy his movies a lot. bt dudes, how many of u have struggled in ur career and had ur dad or some relative to back u up? if u didnt have anyone, and have stood up on your own, u will understand my point.

criticism welcome