india is quite a force, i agree. australia is not a lesser force either and they do have money too. why don't they pull out of the ODIs if they think their concern is valid? why can't they pressurize ICC? till now, australians have been playing all the mind games and stuffs behind curtains. darrel hair, the ruthless aussie umpire, tried to overlook the ICC's decision of a clean chit on Muralitharan for his bowling actions. it was ricky ponting who went to gibbs and told him: "buddy, you dropped the world cup" when latter dropped a sitter from steve waugh. steve bucknor have had a pretty dismal performance career as an umpire before ICC decided to change. it's not just due to indian pressure tactic. i know, harbhajan is an A (beep- beep) hole, but let's try to look at things from all sides. why penalize underdogs all the time?