Posted by: HowardRoark January 27, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Sachin is innovative. Lara relies on sheer power and natural talent.
Sachin is more consistent, and Lara is very inconsistent. Lara plays a couple of great innings every three years, and rest of the times, he is unbelieveably worse. Sachin doesnt score great hundreds nor doesn't win thilling matches. But he keeps scoring 30, 40 or a 100 which contributes to the team, but is insufficent to win single- handedly. With Lara's greatness, you can win an incredible game once in 3 years, but I would choose a player in my team who can score a few runs every match.
In ODIs, there is absolutely no comparison between Sachin and Lara. Sachin wins in all facets.
Sachin is more consistent, and Lara is very inconsistent. Lara plays a couple of great innings every three years, and rest of the times, he is unbelieveably worse. Sachin doesnt score great hundreds nor doesn't win thilling matches. But he keeps scoring 30, 40 or a 100 which contributes to the team, but is insufficent to win single- handedly. With Lara's greatness, you can win an incredible game once in 3 years, but I would choose a player in my team who can score a few runs every match.
In ODIs, there is absolutely no comparison between Sachin and Lara. Sachin wins in all facets.