Posted by: no_quiero January 26, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Maverick you are probably first person to said Lara bats Ugly. So much for your analysis.
Unfortunatly the 241* you are talking about tendulkar isnt a match winning innings. Infact he got more criticisms from indian media after that innings because people said tendulkar slowed down so much that it put everybody to sleep.
Tendulkar winning innings . Sorry guys show me a match wining innings. One i can remember is 155* against Australia in Chennai. But what about the bowling attack of Australia. Adam dale, kasprowickz,, Gavin robertson and injured shane warne. no mcgrath, no fleming, no paul riffel, no Gillespie. Weakest aussie attack for a decade.
And maverick every batsman have their weakness. If you look average of great Garfield sobers against newzealand it is less about 20. Does that make him less batsman.
Quagmire. Tendulkar dominance against bowlers.????? You must be living on 90's. He have failed to consistently dominate over the years.
Unfortunatly the 241* you are talking about tendulkar isnt a match winning innings. Infact he got more criticisms from indian media after that innings because people said tendulkar slowed down so much that it put everybody to sleep.
Tendulkar winning innings . Sorry guys show me a match wining innings. One i can remember is 155* against Australia in Chennai. But what about the bowling attack of Australia. Adam dale, kasprowickz,, Gavin robertson and injured shane warne. no mcgrath, no fleming, no paul riffel, no Gillespie. Weakest aussie attack for a decade.
And maverick every batsman have their weakness. If you look average of great Garfield sobers against newzealand it is less about 20. Does that make him less batsman.
Quagmire. Tendulkar dominance against bowlers.????? You must be living on 90's. He have failed to consistently dominate over the years.