Posted by: KaLyx January 7, 2008
Gyanendra's silence
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

It's not about going against him, u know. It's about the future cosequences. The person, who so actively tookover the nation, is now staying so quiet. This certainaily causes everyone to raise their eyebrows. After all he is the King and he should have made some remarks or welcomed the ongoing political scenario, instead he's doing neither of those.

He might have gotten self-concious about his remarks being condemned in the past, so he might not have made it this time, but looking at the present situation, the fall of monarchy is certain. Being the King with such a historical regards, he must b thinking about some ways to save it.

Another matter of concern is Army chief's recent private visit to India and now China. Is this a part of a King's plan or what? After all at some points, Army chief has been harsh on the political parties as well.

Obviously the nation is in critical condition but king's silence has made the political crisis quite interesting as well. I think King should make some sort of remarks regarding the present situation because his quietness is only fueling the anger of pro-monarchist to think that even they r being sideline from participating in the CA poll. Besides, the unrest in the Terai should b addressed by the King as well if he really cares about the country and should convince them to take part in the developing peaceful political processes.

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article