i don't have anything against his enthusiasm and will to develop nepal. just like of any normal citizen, i respect his love for the country.
all i am trying to point out are two things:

1) his little over-ambitious approach along few lines of his plans..it's important to realize the ground-reality when you sketch a master plan.

2) second thing, while he is entitled to his opinion,i don't quite find any rationale on his sole commentary spitting venom against the political parties alone. if you have missed out, some of his lines clearly indicate that he has soft-corner for prithvi narayan shah's dynasty. on one hand, you see political parties as a bunch of 'fools' (in his own words) and then on the other hand you justify the other regime that veiled the future of nepal by its autocratic games and slow-poisoned the fate of its citizens for 250 freaking years? if you think the ethnic disputes came along only after april 06 (in his reading), then you need to do some reality checking. perhaps need to come out of the history books that sang slogans of praise for the shahs.

that's all :D