Posted by: CopiCat October 11, 2007
maoist were terrorist r and will remain
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

No Way!!!! No covergence regarding kingship!!!

......like you I believe that monarchy is important to hold the glue of unity of Nepal........Even a Ceremonial monarchy like Great Britain .........

How come, even you imagined, I believed there should be any form of monarchy.

Britains would not have adopted any form of monachry, had they had to choose it now. They set up contituitional monarchy at a time when the monarchism had some relevancy. It is a matter of long time before in the dim and distance. Don't talk about 18th/19th century.   

Second, the main stem of the monarchism in Nepal has already been destroyed in 2059BS. Whatever it is now is just the trench. The present king is just enjoying "Aputali", in typical Nepali word.

Third, wherever kings have shown political ambitions, there is unrest and instability. See the recent example of Thailand. Has King ever apologized for his political ambitions and took responsibilities for the consequences out of that. Shouldn't he be accountantable toward people? Had he promised before the people that he would never commit such mistake?Why did he put political leaders in Jail? Had Narahari Acharya, Madhav Kumar Nepal, Krishna Pahadi .....committed crime? (Do you see any political leaders in Jail now? This is what Democracy is. Even mandaley like Kamal Thapa is not in jail, can you imagine this in royal regime? No way)  

 

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article