It's a matter of personal opinion and I find that the overall analysis made by ZZ is true to a good extent. Those abroad might find themselves emotionally troubled by a never-improving situation back home but they do not physically experience the hardship of having to continuously cope with a situation of very poor governance. The idea that those living abroad have little say over matters back home - in whatever (unpleasant)  way  it might have been expressed - is supported by many similar examples in the world arena. Also true is the general placidity and disinterestedness of the Nepalese urban public towards matters of abstract political changes that have little impact on their day-to-day life.   

ZZ has supported his views on present political developments, roadmaps of the political parties, Indian influence and possible Indian military intervention by his own analysis of internal and external players of Nepalese politics. We can have enough discussions and alternative arguments on those issues. It is definitely not fair to assume the writer's deep hatred towards those living abroad by literally reading some of his lines  and start a discussion on such an issue. Lets take it lightly: "मेरो संसार लगायत सबैजसो नेपाली अनलाइन फोरममा तीव्र भारतबिरोधी कमेण्टहरु लेखेर उफ्रिने बन्धुहरु प्राय: सबै बिदेशतिरै पाउरोटी चपाइरहेका हुनाले तिनले गर्ने औँले प्रतिरोध (कमेण्ट टाइप गरेर गरिने प्रतिरोध) ले पनि खासै केही माने राख्ने छैन" Is it not true in essence??