Posted by: lootekukur August 29, 2007
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
i would love to see the rest of the rankings.
i understand that the ranking was strictly based on his personal experience and his views about other players and while i don't have much dissatisfaction or objection about waqar being placed at no. 45, i am quite perplexed to see his fellow australian players tim may and bruce reid, who did not leave any remarkable impression to the cricketing world, placed well ahead of waqar -- a devastating bowler who had one heck of a career.
i would love to know, if i would ever be able to, where would waqar figure had he been an australian....