Posted by: sunima_sh August 25, 2007
Indian Idol and Nepalese Irony
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
LET PEOPLE ENJOY PRASHANT SINGING AND WINNING THE TITLE IF MAJORITY OF PEOPLE THINK THAT PRASHANT IS BEST FOR THEM, THEY WILL VOTE FOR HIM AND HE WINS. AFTERALL INDIAN IDOL IS WHERE PEOPLE CAN SELECT THEIR FAVOURITES (THOUGH NOT THE BEST) THE BEST WINS IN SPORT RELATED THINGS BUT IN INDIAN IDOL THE ONE WHO GETS MAJORITY WINS AND WHAT FACTS DO YOU PUT TO PROVE THAT OTHERS ARE BETTER THAN PRASHANT, MAY BE BECAUSE JUDGES ARE SAYING SO, BUT WHENEVER I WATCH THE SHOW I FIND PRASHANT'S SINGING IS ALWAYS IN TOP THREE SO HE IS STILL THERE, WELL, IF THEY WERE TO CHOOSE THE BEST CANDIDATE BASED ON THEIR MUSICAL CAPABILITY, THAN THEY HAVE TO GATHER A BIG NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE A VERY GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF SINGING TALENT, SUR TAL, (UNLIKE ALISHA AND ANU) THAN LET THEM VOTE AND WIN THE BEST MAN, WHO CARES BUT SINCE ITS LEFT TO PEOPLE TO CHOOSE THEIR BEST AND IF THEIR HEART THINKS THAT PRASHANT IS THE BEST (EITHER BE IT A REGIONAL BIOSNESS OR SINGING TALENT, OR PERSONS ATTITUDE) PRASHANT WILL GET GOOD VOTES AND WINS SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article