Posted by: peace1 July 20, 2007
Maoist Contribution to Nepal
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Mr Ramlakhan Wrote: "1. Inclusive Democracy( equal representation that means all will share proportionately if not equally- both responibilities as well as blames- Bahuns wont get the all the blames for being the bad politicians) " R u kidding me! that trend was there in the past, is now and will be there forever. Just read below, analyze and get yourself enlighten. A.K.A Commieeeeie!!! Say no to Commiee bastard!!!!!!!!! From kantipuronline: The most revolutionary Nepali Political Party, which is responsible for the death of more than 15,000 lives, is CPN Maoist. They have promised to overthrow the feudalistic society of Nepal and deliver a free and fair society where workers get a fare share. Ideologically they have lost ground but still they are trying hard to prove that they are core followers of the Shining Path and Pol Pot style socialist revolution. Ultimately, they are at the crossroads of modern capitalism and traditional nationalistic extremism. They are in a dilemma, whether to choose economic reform, social reconstruction, the diplomatic approach, patriotic approach, OR just keep following the rules of intimidation and torture. Time is ruthless. Their political forecast to win the Nepali hearts by activating YCL failed and they are running around red-faced. The recent crisis in the Middle East, bloodbath between Fatah and Hamas factions, who share the Palestine Government, have shattered them. Apparently, the Maoist style leadership is a carbon copy of Hamas in Palestine, who are in government and they still shut down the nation, kill people, kidnap, murder, extort etc. The Maoists and their allies often shut down sections of the country. The recent row between the PM and the Maoist supremo has triggered uncertainty when it comes to the real motives of the Maoists and the sincerity of the SPAM unity as a whole. Personally, I don’t believe in such a democracy where a political party enjoys national flag and also engages in forceful abduction, extortion, kidnapping and murder. The country is still experiencing loads of extra judicial killings, disappearances, internal displacement, continuing seizure of private properties, and the constant fear of torture/intimidation/physical punishment. There are various public propagandas about the Maoist vision for the future of Nepal. People are getting the first smell- their commitment to competitive multiparty democracy and enterprise-based economy. And yet again, Brahmins and Chetris control the leadership of this red flag party. Here is the list: • Puspa Kamal Dahal • Kiran Vaidhya • Baburam Bhattarai • CP Gajurel • Dinanath Sharma • Krishna Br Mahara • Hishila Bhattarai (Yami) • Pamfa Bhusal • Top Br Rayamajhi • Janardan Sharma • Lokendra Bista • Lekh Raj Bhatta • Naraya Dahal • Bamdev Chetri • Purna Subedi • Amrita Thapa • Satya Pahadi • Sarala Regmi • Khim Devkota The list may go on forever. They talk about autonomous regions and supremacy in their own region by their own people. Who belongs where? Are we going back to the 15th century to find out who ruled certain regions and who deserves what? Is this is the call of the 21st century? Are we heading for a united nation or for a divided nation than ever before? Today’s call is not for division but for harmony and consolidation. We must dream a nation where people from every race, religion, sex, and ethnicity come to the arena and be proud and humble for being a Nepali. Autonomous regions or a federal model of governance is understandable. But why can’t a Tamang be a Chief of the Tharuwan Region? Why can’t a Gauchan be a Chief of the Kirat region? OR why can’t a Brahmin be a Chief of the Khumbhuwan Region? OR why can’t a Chaudhary be a Chief of a Chure Bhaware? A charismatic Magar leader born in Birgunj should go to Rolpa to engage in politics. Where does he belong? Are you apprehending the democratic rights of movement and habitation within the nation? Time needs answers not promises. We belong to the same country vesting the same themes of nationality. We are covered and secured by the same constitution, then why is there such division in the leadership style. Indigenous communities or the Nepali people as a whole are taking none of theses decisions. A bunch of tyrants, who mostly belong to aristocratic and suppressive families, design, develop, decide and implement these policies. If we believe in democracy, every major decision should be decided by a referendum, where people’s voices are heard rather than regulated.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article