My only question to Ramlakhan, Whatever you said , you said without much logic but thats fine. how are maoist fighting for anti-racism,anti-feudal establishment,for freedom, when they promote racial seperation by injecting racial feelings .Why race should matter?Could not all be Nepalese and not Tamang and Tharu.Couldn't they have routed their war in the direction to make all Nepalese Equal and not Tamang (in book) and Tharu ?.Or was is just a plan to divide and tell the whole world that they respect these ethnics and want to empower them.If Then how many ethnic people are leading the Maoist party?why same Brahim ..So why preach something you are not following?Isn't it hypocrisy? Now don't say later establishment are hypocrite too.May be but how does that make Maoist any different? Also, how are they fighting anti-feudal establisment, when they are creating their own feudal society , where Maoist leaders dominate the villages,How is it different than Jamindar dominating villages?When just people who pull string changes and not the way of working?And don't say it will happen ..It has to happen now Atleast from maoist side they need to show us what they are going to give us!! And lets not even go about freedom ..I can fill pages on hypocrisy and defination of freedom. How a Hypocritic ideal could have contributed in betterment of Nepal?