'''shonesum Email Posted on 07-10-07 10:10 PM Reply | Notify Admin ahaha Ramlakhan... Let me ask u a question... Do u want prachanda to represent Nepali When he killed thousands of Nepali to get into this position.... '' BE IT PRACHANDA OR BE IT PRITHVI NARAYAN SHAH ...WHAT DIFFERENCE IS THERE??BOTH SHED BLOOD FOR A CAUSE....ONE TO EXPAND ,ONE TO BRING REVOLUTION.-History sees the cause not the means. i m sure prithvi narayan shah cut off many of the nepalese throats.. must have killed nepalese 10 times more.but at the end the cause was 'good'. I see the people's war no different than any other revolutions in the world.If it was so simple people would not risk their lives. Bitter but true , I have never seen revolution being successful without some blood shed.What we should be more interested is the 'Cause'.... At least we can hope to see the NEW NEPAL for real. The country is still in transition and some CHAOS in the country is inevitable .We have evidenced that in our neighbour country India itself.Even the Gandhian revolution saw lots of blood shed. That doesnt make him killer. I am sure there were fools like you ''shonesum'' at the time of those chaotic transition who wanted the BRITISH back......I am sure british were equally good in 'disciplining' people like your gyanendra (whether by means of curfew or otherwise).You thought that was peace??? There might have been peace during british era or rana era or even panchayats ..but not 'Content ,equallity and dignity'-which is more powerful and peaceful than your sense of 'peace'. If people wanted that kind of peace then there wouldnt have been the end of British era, end of Ranas era or end of panchayats era...or neither the beginning of People's war. SORRY FOLKS for some reason my mssgs get posted 3 times automatically .