Few things I would like to add: 1) With In last six month there have been numerous news/speculation why Royal Commission did not take action against Ram Chandra Paudel. It is believed that Palace instructed the Royal commission not to take action against him – because he is a loyal royalist. Ram Chandra Paudel never refuted the allegation. 2) What bothers me the most is that Paudel has been a staunch (most vocal) supporter for postponing the CA election. Why? I have no idea. Certainly, it has helped Ganendra ET Al greatly. 3) Paudel declared his property after being a minister in 1990 once. That was the first and last time. This time also he did not bother to declare his property. What is he scare of if his earnings were legitimate? My take about Paudel is that he is one of the “Dwad Charitra” politicians. I would not be surprised if he is a royal. Certainly postponing CA election, Paudel and his party has done big favor to the King. Nabin