Why do you need 200 cc bike for normal use? Countries that don't allow pillion rider in the mo-bike encourage using 50cc bikes for normal use, some of them do not allow bikes having more than 75 cc engine to run on their street. The most economical and scientific policy is to use smaller engines for normal use. So most bike-riding (developed) countries allow to use either 50cc bikes for normal ride or use greater than 250 cc bikes (with special licence) for sports use. In nepal, we allow pillion rider + some extra loads in mo-bike, for which, 100 cc bikes are the most suitable ones. To tell the truth, riding 125 to 200 or 250 cc bikes for normal use is gross wastage of expensive petroleum and ruining environment for no benefit. They are called in-efficient choice for normal use. These 125 to 200 or 250 cc bikes produced in India with 4-stroke cyllinder performs far below than a real sports-bike of 250+ cc 2-stroke engine. These 4-stroke-bikes never deliver needed power and performance to thrill their riders. I don't understand why South asian bike-riders are happy with such a crap-amphibious-model - neither good for normal use nor for sporty purpose. It just make people laughing who understand what is bike-riding.