Does any one have any problem accepting the fact that Dipendra did it all? If so, why? - we should not forget the blames on him (may be rumors) that he used to be in drugs all the time. - There was a very bad news about him in Eton, where he had to apologize with a royal girl. - His name was always attached with drugs - Never heard of good word about him. I have no doubt in my mind that this royal massacre was carried out by Dipendra. If you refute on this argument, please do so with logicially. Kiran