WHERE the FECK DOES IT SAY THAT HE"S THE GREATEST BATSMAN AFTER DON BRADMAN YOU PAKI ISI AGENT?! WHAT tHE HELL ARE YOU Trying tO Do in here? You asked if Biratnagar should be the next capital of NEpal. What are you trying to do in here? We all know that you're a hardcore paki fan so why should we be shocked to see a paki trying to tell us that lara is better than Tendulkar? You FECKIN hypocrite. WHAT THE FEck makes you think that your opinions matter more than 80 percent of all genuine cricket fans who believe that tendulkar is the BEST batsman of this era?! Mark Waugh, Lara, Hayden, Ponting, De Silva all are greats and they enjoyed fair share of reign at top level, but nobody can uproot Tendulkar's dominance in this era. Seriously, you know why you're being a hypocrite? You know that you're being wrong? MOST experts didn't believe that Lara's 375 was as great as it seems because England has a POOR bowling attack then. His 400 came at a pitch that SUITED a batsman heavily. So according to your assumptions, Mark Waugh should be an average batsman right you moron because his best is only 153? Atapattu should be the top 3 batsman then and Murali should be better than Warnie then right? Who the FECK are you to tell me to get a life you paki musalte supporter?