Posted by: gyaani_keta February 25, 2007
So, did they really need to kill 10,000 plus people?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
few weeks ago ,the front page of a popular online news website had a picture of the supreme comando(ar) delivering his grand vision for Nepal. According to him, the Maoists will push for a mixed economy and that people shouldn't be scared that their assets will be seized by the Maoists. What a fudging joke he is?? No matter how progressive the current reforms are, they have been tainted by the blood of more than 10,000 innocent Nepalese. We had a political system modeled after some of the oldest and successful political systems in the world. We could have brought the current reforms without this bloodshed. The system wasn't the problem; it was the people running the system that were the problem. He could have very well run for an election, won an election and could have changed the system being a parliamentarian and leading by example. But, No the douche had to prove his point by killing innocent people. He proved that violence and bloodshed is the way to bring about a change and look what has happened now. I am not advocating for the monarchy or girija. They are corrupt greedy idiots but they didn't "mass murder" innocent people. No matter what will happen to Nepal, the legacy of the Maoists will always be associated with fear and terrorism.....
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article