" Give me more evidence how can you raise all these good questions and say that king or monarchy is going to save us from all these problems? Do you consider them as god? Otherwise, it's not going to be possible. There're significant number of people who doesn't see monarchy as unifying power or the symbol of unification. If you can convince me, I'm ready to start lobbying for monarchy. You mentioned that monarchy can be me? How? I'm old enough to wait to marry princess and Prerana is already married. The thing that I don't like about monarchy is that you've to be in blood relation. There is no value of other people. " Do you agree with me that every step Girija, MaKuNe or Prachanda take, they have to or are taking orders from India. Specially, in my opinion, I have found Prachanda more close to Congress I of India than BJP. That was the reason why these leaders declared secular state without any logical debate. Since Congress I is against Monarchs (thus, monarchy) of nepal (Rajeev Gandhi case and others), against Hinduism, Prachanda has been the most loyal dog for them. Girija and others were loyal to BJP. whereas, our royal family has never been the loyal dog of indian governments. they have tried to keep a proper distance from both india and china. Just take an example, once Gyanendra took over, he distanced himself from india and tried to bring china more close so that the nepal can be equidistant from both. Since, they are not from khas or kirat or madhise or bhote or anything, they have been able to be equidistant from all the ethnic groups of nepal, while working for the integretity and sovereignty of the country. Thats why, monarchy can be an unifying entity of Nepal. Lets say, if prachanda becomes king instead of gyanendra, then he will convert nepal to india. same with girija, if he becomes the sole head of the country, nepal will cease to exist. there is a need of absolutely non-political, non-alligned figure to represent nepal. if anybody can save the integrety and sovereignty of Nepal, then other problems are minor. No. I do not consider them as god. question to those who do not see king as unifying power: who do u think, if becomes the head of the country, will represent the unifying figure of Nepal? Ya, why stick to Gyanendra or Paras as king? Lets make my son the king. I am against president thing because, the fight to become the president creates biasness, cunningness in the leaders. and when they get the power, there are high chances that it will be misused. and, frequent change of the head denigrates the head's respect. fck blood relation.