Ashu, now you are back in the track about Chintan, who can (and does) talk bullshit on many issues (including the drinking water issue) on which his knowledge base does not belongs to. त्यसैलाइ मैले भनेको - कच्चा बैद्यको मात्रा यमपुरीको यात्रा । But I am not saying he always speaks bullshit. People admire him if he speaks his own gut being free from the influence of groups having vested interests and stop misusing media. You may enjoy working with him until you get piece of bone for that, and how you synchronize with him is out of my interest. FYI, his opinions and approach does not satisfy me on melamchi issues. My opinions may match to his or yours ones in a different issue. Your goofy arguments in defense of Chintan are good MASALAA for me to keep laughing for the day. Hey what is this - ..... keeps us all honest at the end of the day ....; he he he. Just I wonder you may suggest allowing some thieves to exist in our society so that (1) police would have something to work on, (2) public would be aware on importance of security and blah blah. Too funny. I don't agree Chintanian activities keep one honest in Nepal. He was and is active in Nepal in the entire period when the largest scale of corruption and misconducts occurred in the history of Nepal. I thought I wouldn't talk about Pratyoush but you are compelling me for that too. Well, for now, I won't go more into that because he definitely has earned much elevated reputation compared to Chintan. You can't compare these two guys and mix up in the issue of this thread. कहाँको किरा कहाँको हिरा । I was just referring the article you sighted, which was merely a kind of goodwill article rather than an independent review that came to support Chintan in his hard days. Surely Pratyush wouldn't have written that piece if these two guys weren't long - time friends. Otherwise, you must have had read similar articles from Pratyush written on many others who have definitely contributed much a lot than Chintan did in contemporary issues. That’s why I don't put any value on that particular article despite respecting Pratyoush for his other works. Got it?